Caregivers are the
backbone of this society and as such, the country must
begin to honor and support their needs and desires.
Without caregivers willing to give up their personal
lives to keep their loved ones at home, the economic
crisis our country is presently facing will be much
worse and the Medicaid deficit may reach a trillion
dollar amount within the year. It makes economic sense
to allow caregivers to direct the care of their family
members, especially if the family member is no longer
able or willing to care for himself or herself and the
caregiver is willing and able to take this
responsibility. After all, without the caregiver, there
is nothing that will keep a frail person at home.
It also makes human
sense to provide financial assistance to caregivers.
Some of them will need to give up their jobs because
employers may not be sensitive to the caregivers’ needs
or would be willing to allow for the missing days and
missing focus. Caregivers should be assisted financially
if they are willing to provide the services. This way,
the entire family can financially afford to take care of
a frail child or a sick elder at home.
However, even though
it makes economic and human sense to change the existing
policy and begin to invest in the caregiver and in the
family, no government official has taken the leap of
faith to change the system. On the contrary, we continue
to invest hundred of millions of dollars in supporting
and expanding nursing home placement while family
members watch in horror as their physical, emotional and
financial strength disappears.
If it makes sense to
help families direct the care for their loved ones and
even receive payment for what they are willing to do,
why is our government maintaining a system of care
driven not by the consumers, but by the agencies? Our
country’s system of care gives control and decision
making authority to the agencies and businesses, not the
person or the family. This system is very expensive,
impersonal and inflexible. It is my belief that unless
the caregivers of the nation come together to demand
with one voice that our loved ones be given the option
of direct control of their care, the system will not
change and the resources we need to make our family
situation more manageable will continue to go elsewhere.
The only power we have is the power of our combined,
synchronized voices demanding that our state provide a
consumer directed care option. Unless we speak up, this
will never happen because we will be left out of the
dialogue and negotiations will take place at the time of
budget allocations where we have no representation.
I am a firm believer
in consumer directed care. It is the only mechanism
allowing caregivers and their loved ones to choose the
providers and to select the best combination of services
to meet their unique needs. This is particularly
important in rural areas where consumers may be waiting
to receive services, not because the money is not
available to pay for services, but because there are not
enough workers to provide services. There are not enough
workers or agencies willing to transport the individual,
to deliver daily meals or to bathe the patient. In
situations like this, it makes sense to hire a family
member. I say hire, because in some cases, the family
doesn’t have the financial resources to survive without
a job. This is a cost effective way to deal with the
aging population and in meet the demand for quality
care. What we have found is that the family member or
neighbor hired to perform the caregiving job will spend
more than the limited hours of service a worker from an
agency will be able to provide and will do so for the
same compensation.
Consumer directed
care is one of the solutions to the budget crisis we are
presently facing. It eliminates some of the
administrative costs that are now consuming more and
more of our tax dollars. It also caps the cost of
providing services because family members are more
willing than providers to accept the existing payment
system and do much, much more with the same and not ask
for a higher reimbursement rate or for increased
benefits. Let’s face it: Caregivers have no benefits, no
salary and no options. Most caregivers would be happy
with a little support and more control of the lives and
dignity of their families.
Maybe the way to
make sure consumer directed care is not forgotten is to
add a consumer directed care option to each of the
existing states’ laws and to incorporate the consumer
directed care program as an integral part of the
Administration on Aging’s new Caregivers Initiative
program. This is our window of opportunity to
incorporate in the implementation of the Caregivers’
Initiative program at the local level. The Caregivers’
Initiative at the federal level was designed to support
new ideas and new efforts to make caregivers’ lives
easier. So far, the funding for the local programs has
not met the expectations. What I have seen is that the
programs getting financial support are not introducing
new ideas, but just expanding some of the already tested
concepts like additional respite hours to cover weekends
and nights, more regional conferences, or adding
multilingual support groups. These are good expansions,
but they do not focus on the intent and purpose of the
Caregivers’ Initiative. Consumer directed care can do
what it can to meet the goals and objectives of the
Caregivers’ Initiative program while introducing a more
humane and dignified way for our caregivers and their
family members to age in place, age with the security
and purpose in the home and community they love.
Whether consumer
directed care makes it to the general public and becomes
a household idea is up to us. If we don’t ask for the
program, we will never get it and it may go away because
of lack of demand. We need to take a more active role to
assure that our generation of caregivers are given the
option to stay at home without more sacrifices than what
is needed. We need to allow the caregivers to do what
they do best without worrying about their own futures.
The time is now to request the establishment of consumer
directed care as a service option. If we remain silent,
we will never be able to achieve the control we desire
in the care of our elders, our children and our most
frail citizens. This is your wake up call to action.
Gema G. Hernandez was
the Secretary of the Florida Department of Elder Affairs
from January 5, 1999 through October 2001. During her
tenure, Secretary Hernandez facilitated the most
comprehensive programs for Caregivers in the nation
ranging from the implementation of Consumer Directed
Care, the institutionalization of Caregivers regional
and statewide conferences, the inclusion of Caregivers
liability and challenges in the client assessment tool
and the development of a new caregiver’s burden scale,
specifically designed to capture the values and beliefs
of the Hispanic population. Dr. Hernandez is now a
consultant. She can be reached at:
elderreadycommunity@earthlink.net